When you create a sink connector in Kafka Connect, by default it will start reading from the beginning of the topic and stream all of the existing—and new—data to the target. The setting that controls this behaviour is auto.offset.reset, and you can see its value in the worker log when the connector runs:

Kafka Connect has as REST API through which all config should be done, including removing connectors that have been created. Sometimes though, you might have reason to want to manually do this—and since Kafka Connect running in distributed mode uses Kafka as its persistent data store, you can achieve this by manually writing to the topic yourself.

Here’s a hacky way to automatically restart Kafka Connect connectors if they fail. Restarting automatically only makes sense if it’s a transient failure; if there’s a problem with your pipeline (e.g. bad records or a mis-configured server) then you don’t gain anything from this. You might want to check out Kafka Connect’s error handling and dead letter queues too.

Kafka Connect configuration is easy - you just write some JSON! But what if you’ve got credentials that you need to pass? Embedding those in a config file is not always such a smart idea. Fortunately with KIP-297 which was released in Apache Kafka 2.0 there is support for external secrets. It’s extendable to use your own ConfigProvider, and ships with its own for just putting credentials in a file - which I’ll show here. You can read more here.

Kafka Connect exposes a REST interface through which all config and monitoring operations can be done. You can create connectors, delete them, restart them, check their status, and so on. But, I found a situation recently in which I needed to delete a connector and couldn’t do so with the REST API. Here’s another way to do it, by amending the configuration Kafka topic that Kafka Connect in distributed mode uses to persist configuration information for connectors. Note that this is not a recommended way of working with Kafka Connect—the REST API is there for a good reason :)

There is an open issue for support of EXPLODE/UNNEST functionality in KSQL, and if you need it then do up-vote the issue. Here I detail a hacky, but effective, workaround for exploding arrays into multiple messages—so long as you know the upper-bound on your array.