I’m a geek. I like understanding things in their absolute entirety. It frustrates me to have to make presumptions or assumptions about something. I like to get down ’n dirty and find out what makes things tick. So that necessitates reading manuals. And unfortunately, Oracle don’t make that easy all the time. Some of the manuals are not very good, and others are difficult to find. Given the complexity of the OBIEE stack and proliferation of terminology and product names, sorting the wheat from the chaff can be a headache.

Introduction We’re in the process of implemention Resource Manager (RM) on our Oracle 11gR1 Data Warehouse. We’ve currently got one DW application live, but have several more imminent. We identified RM as a suitable way of - as the name would suggest - managing the resources on the server. In the first instance we’re looking at simply protecting CPU for, and from, future applications. At some point it would be interesting to use some of the more granular and precise functions to demote long-running queries, have nighttime/daytime plans, etc.

This problem, which in essence is bad behaviour from Informatica bringing down Oracle, is a good illustration of unintended consequences of an apparently innocuous security setting. Per our company’s security standards, database passwords expire every 90 days. When this happens users are prompted to change their password before they can continue logging into Oracle. This applies to application user IDs too. It appears that Informatica 8.6.1 HF6 (part of OBIA 7.

A very short blog post to break the drought, but I didn’t hit any google results for this error so thought it might be useful to record it. In BI Publisher 10.1.3.4, trying to install the Scheduler (Quartz) schema, I got this error: [sourcecode]Schema installation failed while creating tables. Schema may already exist. Please remove the existing schema or choose another database and try again.[/sourcecode] To me, the error text is a bit unhelpful.

@alexgorbachev tweeted me recently after picking up my presentation on Performance Testing and OBIEE. His question got me thinking, and as ever the answer “It Depends” is appropriate here :-) Why is the measurement being done? Without knowing the context of the work Alex is doing, how to measure depends on whether the measurement needs to be of: - The actual response times that the users are getting, or The response times that the system is currently capable of delivering This may sound like splitting hairs or beard-scratching irrelevance, but it’s not.

Here are a couple of little unix scripts that I wrote whilst developing my performance testing OBIEE method. They’re nothing particularly special, but may save you the couple of minutes it’d take to write them :) Note that some of this data is available from Usage Tracking and where it is I’d recommend getting it from there, databases generally being easier to reliably and repeatably query than a transient log file.

OBIEE 11g is going to be officially launched on 7th July (this year!) in London: Launch Event: Introducing Oracle Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition 11g h/t to Twitter and blogs (including an Oracle-branded one) this morning. Good news travels fast! :-) Looks like John Minkjan won the bet, did he know something we didn’t? ;-) (although is “Launch” the same as “GA”?)

Here’s my presentation “Performance Testing and OBIEE” that I gave at the RittmanMead BI Forum 2010: Performance Testing and OBIEE.pptx It’s a Powerpoint 2007 file (pptx) for which you may need the Microsoft PowerPoint Viewer 2007. I’ve included copious notes on each slide which hopefully cover the gist of what I talked about when I was delivering it. There are also a handful of funky animations which is why I’ve left it in pptx and not exported to PDF or other format (sorry Open Office users).

I delivered my first presentation today, at the RittmanMead BI Forum.I was really nervous in the hours and minutes leading up to it, but once I got up there and started talking I actually quite enjoyed it. If you were in the audience, I’d love some feedback in the comments section below, particularly any “constructive criticism”. I obviously didn’t make too much of a mess of it, as I was awarded “best speaker” of the event, which was a great honour.

I’ve just returned from the RittmanMead 2010 BI Forum which this year was at the Seattle Hotel in Brighton Marina. The event was limited to 50 attendees, and I think this was a good number. The event was explicitly pitched at a very technical expert level, and the audience very much represented this. Whereas at a larger conference you may find the odd manager wandering around pretending to be technical ;-) this event was most definitely not pitched at such types.